Advertisement

Key Ingredients to Making M&A Brand Decisions

By Bill Gullan
Published: March 22, 2017 | Last updated: March 21, 2024
Key Takeaways

Mergers and acquisitions lead to branding questions. What does your new brand need to say about you? Here are some key factors to consider.

human-people-person-collage-poster-art-brochure-flyer-paper-beverage

Once you have completed a merger or acquisition, the new company that is born requires its own identity. Branding plays an integral role in merger and acquisition success. With 70-90% of mergers failing to create value, deciding what your new brand image should be carries significant weight. One thing has been abundantly clear throughout — the right brand architecture approach is situational.

Advertisement

Many factors should be considered including the category, history, relative brand equities, the deal thesis and go-forward plan and objective. Since there are many moving parts, Finch Brands is frequently called upon to help determine the right approach. Here is what we consider:

Brand History and Culture

In order to decide where the company is headed, we first assess the organizational and cultural factors that have led to the success of each organization. This involves extensive listening to both senior management and rank-and-file input. Active listening helps us understand historical success factors, potential cultural landmines and the extent of the option set.

Advertisement

An example would be an acquired company with a particularly strong sense of self and deeply felt mission — there is extra danger in moving away completely from such a brand name (internally and externally).

Brand Equity

To fully evaluate brand strategy options available, it is essential to assess the relative equity of each existing brand. This process includes quantitative and qualitative research with consumers and internal stakeholders to test several factors. These factors should at minimum include current brand perceptions, brand awareness, reasons for customer loyalty/attrition and brand stretch or brand elasticity.

This process helps us understand the risks and opportunities associated with choosing what/which brand to elevate. It is likely that ‘Reverse Stronger Horse’ brand strategies — such as when First Union re-branded to Wachovia, its much smaller acquisition — spring from a sober analysis of which brand possesses higher potential equity (not just which is larger).

Advertisement

Business Thesis

After reviewing the history and relative equities of all brands in the transaction, it is time to look to the future. What is the reason behind the merger? What is hoped to be gained by combining strengths? What pieces of each brand are most valuable to the joint organization? Answering these critical questions helps shed light onto which brand identity option can carry more weight as the joint organization moves forward.

An example here would be if a deal thesis is based on geographical expansion — in such a case, a legacy identity with a strong regional reference might not be the best to carry forward. Or it might make more sense to keep strong regional brands in place such as when over-arching corporate companies keep the front-line business and its brand intact, though it is now under the conglomerate’s umbrella.

Advertisement

Market Dynamics

The final piece to consider is what’s happening in the market you serve. Are there fundamental changes or shifts in the category that might herald a change in brand strategy? How does the merger stand to help you better serve this category?

A shining example is the decision to launch a new brand when Bell Atlantic and GTE merged — it was clear that neither brand would effectively transition to a telecom world increasingly dominated by mobile. Thus, Verizon was born.

Migration

One other consideration is the ability to adopt a temporary branding strategy or a phased approach that enables migration over time. In some cases, this provides time and space for the right kind of process. In other cases, a brand name may hang on in a less prominent role only to eventually go away all together. Executives should understand that the brand choice is so critical that what is decisive and quick is not always right.

Conclusion

When it comes time to finalize your merger or acquisition, considering the above factors will help you make well-informed decisions and (hopefully) choose the strategy that creates the most value. Should you become overwhelmed in the process, you can reach out to merger and acquisition branding experts such as Finch Brands to assist in creating the brand that works best for you. After all, your brand says a lot about your company and should be crafted carefully, with thought and skill, to give you the best platform possible to move forward with.

Share This Article

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Advertisement

Written by Bill Gullan

Bill Gullan
As president of Finch Brands, Bill Gullan is one of the marketplace’s premier brand developers. A world-class speaker, writer and facilitator, Bill’s point of view is highly sought after by clients and in the worlds of media and academia. Across a nearly 20-year career, his work has influenced hundreds of brands — including particularly powerful recent successes for Everlast, Conair and ThinkGeek.

Related Articles

Go back to top