The Exit Planning Institute Doesn’t Want You to Exit

By Scott Yoder
Published: October 23, 2013 | Last updated: April 16, 2021
Key Takeaways

Economic Value is a great tool to ensure your private company can deliver you market rate or above returns. Sadly, it is not broadly utilized by private companies.


After attending the Exit Planning Institute (EPI) annual conference, I found myself on the plane ride home reviewing the notes I took and scanning the conference schedule to see if I used my time wisely. I noticed that EPI conducted only three sessions, out of a total of the 29 offered, dealing with the actual transaction of an owner’s exit. Instead, EPI dedicated a majority of the conference to educating its members in three core categories:

  1. Best practices in measuring, building and protecting ownership value;
  2. Assisting closely-held owners in navigating family and multi-generational dynamics; and
  3. Data and trends of owners and the private capital markets.

I think EPI is making an important distinction in its goals for members. Because "exit" is the first word in their title, most would naturally consider business exits to be their focus. However, a core tenet and a primary reason EPI was initially founded was to help owners build sustainable and valuable businesses prior to an owner’s exit.

Case In Point – One Value Enhancing Tool

A case in point was a session led by Rob Slee, Chris Snider and Sean Hutchinson on one of my favorite topics – Economic Value (EV). The concept of EV has been widely used by public companies for decades as a tool to help insure company decisions are enhancing and not eroding shareholder value. When implemented correctly, it can be a powerful conduit that focuses an entire organization on value creating activities. But EV is rarely applied to middle market private companies.


Economic value is defined as the value created in excess of the required return expectation of the company’s capital providers (shareholders and lenders). Put another way, it is the profit of the firm remaining after subtracting out the cost of capital (debt and equity) employed to produce the profit.

The return expectation of debt lenders is relatively easy to determine, but what are the return expectations of equity by privately held business owners? Or more importantly, what should the equity return expectations be? One measure of equity expectation is a recent Pepperdine Private Capital Markets report that states the compounded annual return expectations for business owners should range between 20 percent to 43 percent based on the size and risk profile of the company. Thus, owners should expect at a minimum, that the annual return of their ownership should yield somewhere in this range based on their company’s profile.

How does a business owner achieve these returns? The tool Slee, Snider and Hutchinson suggest applying is EV. EV increases the value of a company in three ways:

  1. The EV metric can assess if the company, product lines, or projects are building or destroying ownership value;
  2. EV can correctly allocate a company’s limited capital to the best value building activities or ownership distributions; and
  3. The EV metric can fully align management with ownership objectives by using EV in management incentive plans, project performance evaluations, and business line measurements.

Just in case you were wondering what this has to do with exit planning, educated buyers purchase businesses using the same EV core concepts.

Case Study – Using EV

A previous client of mine had a profitable wholesaling business that was doing $30 million in revenue with a respectable and above industry growth outlook. He engaged me to do a transactional valuation as he was being courted by a strategic acquirer and wanted to determine whether the price and terms contained in the letter of intent he received were fair. As part of my findings, I showed him that the return he had been receiving, and was expecting to receive, on his private company equity investment was averaging 4 percent. By comparison, most wealth advisors would have told my client he could expect a 6% to 8% on his money in the public markets. What’s more, he could diversify his risk better in the far more liquid public markets. In essence, my client was getting a much lower return, in a very illiquid investment with a significantly higher risk, by running a profitable wholesaling business. Why was he doing this? We realized he hadn’t been using the correct metrics to run his business. Had he employed EV in his strategic and operational planning, the results might have been vastly different.


My Hope

My hope is that there are two takeaways from this piece. First, the Exit Planning Institute focus is first on building value for your firm, so that it may be monetized when a business owner is eventually ready to exit. Second, most business owners need to start looking at their companies from a shareholder perspective and examine it with the same financial discipline as they would their public stock portfolio. They need to remember that that private companies are, comparatively, illiquid and risky and thus need a greater return to justify the investment (20%-43%). Therefore, every smart business owner should be working to reach these marks. Getting there won’t be easy, but the tools of Economic Value can help you in the process by aligning your team to focus on what is important – ownership value creation.

Share This Article

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Written by Scott Yoder

Scott Yoder
Scott Yoder, CEPA, CMAA, CPA (inactive) is a Partner with Strategic Equity Advisors, LLP (Smolin Lupin affiliate); a boutique merger and acquisition advisory firm specializing in divesture strategies for owners of closely held companies. In this role, I collaborate with ownership, their families, and their advisors to develop and implement strategies that maximize wealth upon transfer in accord with overall ownership objectives.

Related Articles

Go back to top