Question
What should be considered when hiring an M&A lawyer?
Answer
Well, I’ll tell you a couple of things, the primary one, obviously, being the experience. I know that’s often said as the first answer, but there are a lot of law firms that do a little bit of M&A or casually do it, or they have a general corporate department. Over the last two years, our lawyers
at Seyfarth Shaw have been engaged in more than 200 M&A transactions across a diverse range of industries. I mean, we do more deals than any other law firm. There are a lot of things we don’t do, but M&A is certainly not one of them. You want to go with a firm that knows what’s happening in terms of best practices and current market conditions and that type of thing.
The second thing is, does the lawyer know the industry? There are a lot of subtleties among transactions and some knowledge and experience within the industry is always a plus. It’s maybe not completely dispositive. Sometimes it creates conflicts of interest but it’s certainly beneficial to have knowledge in the industry.
Third, what does the lawyer know about the business of business? You can look at the M&A lawyer as the creator of paper work, or you can look at the M&A lawyer as somebody that is really going to be one of the key strategic advisors on the deal. Naturally, we prefer the latter if possible and so part of the interview and selection process should always be what other value will the M&A lawyer bring to the table beyond good documents because in some ways, good documents and even some degree of experience is a bit of a commodity.
The fourth element I would add is a degree of pragmatism. I come into the transaction and I think, "How do I help the client meet its objectives?" Some people come into the transaction and think, "How do I look good by derailing this transaction?" I’ve never thought that way. My brain doesn’t even work that way. I mean, I want to help the client meet its business objectives. Now, if meeting the business objectives means that the client shouldn’t do the deal, then that’s fine and, then I will be a deal breaker, but you’ve got to come into it with a deal maker mindset that the client has chosen to do this, as long as the business premises of the transaction have been tested and confirmed.
at Seyfarth Shaw have been engaged in more than 200 M&A transactions across a diverse range of industries. I mean, we do more deals than any other law firm. There are a lot of things we don’t do, but M&A is certainly not one of them. You want to go with a firm that knows what’s happening in terms of best practices and current market conditions and that type of thing.
The second thing is, does the lawyer know the industry? There are a lot of subtleties among transactions and some knowledge and experience within the industry is always a plus. It’s maybe not completely dispositive. Sometimes it creates conflicts of interest but it’s certainly beneficial to have knowledge in the industry.
Third, what does the lawyer know about the business of business? You can look at the M&A lawyer as the creator of paper work, or you can look at the M&A lawyer as somebody that is really going to be one of the key strategic advisors on the deal. Naturally, we prefer the latter if possible and so part of the interview and selection process should always be what other value will the M&A lawyer bring to the table beyond good documents because in some ways, good documents and even some degree of experience is a bit of a commodity.
The fourth element I would add is a degree of pragmatism. I come into the transaction and I think, "How do I help the client meet its objectives?" Some people come into the transaction and think, "How do I look good by derailing this transaction?" I’ve never thought that way. My brain doesn’t even work that way. I mean, I want to help the client meet its business objectives. Now, if meeting the business objectives means that the client shouldn’t do the deal, then that’s fine and, then I will be a deal breaker, but you’ve got to come into it with a deal maker mindset that the client has chosen to do this, as long as the business premises of the transaction have been tested and confirmed.
Tags
Written by Andrew J. Sherman

Andrew J. Sherman is a Partner in the Corporate Department of Seyfarth Shaw LLP
More Q&As from our experts
- What are important legal issues to consider in a Letter of Intent?
- What corporate governance changes can drive shareholder value?
- How do you value intangible assets in a business sale?
Related Terms
Related Articles
Term of the Day
Types of sellers refers to the three classifications in which a seller of a company may fall into. These three...
Read Full Term
Subscribe To the Divestopedia Newsletter!
Stay on top of new content from Divestopedia.com. Join one of our email newsletters and get the latest insights about selling your business in your inbox every week.
Resources
- Divestopedia’s M&A Fee Guide 2022 - 2023
- Purchase and Sale Agreement Considerations for Acquirers - Handouts
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP - Survey of Key M&A Middle Market Deal Terms
- Firmex’s M&A Fee Guide 2021 - 2022
- Your Guide to VC Funding
- Financial Services M&A: Consolidation & Innovation January 2021
- SS&C Intralinks® 2021 Corporate Restructuring Report